Let’s Talk Bookish: What Makes A Good Villain

Let’s Talk Bookish is a weekly meme hosted by Rukky @ Eternity Books and Dani @ Literary Lion. This week’s topic is ‘What Makes A Good Villain’!

Villains are an important part of any story. Our heroes have to face obstacles to achieving their goal and there is almost always a villain standing in their way. But what makes a good villain? I like to see villains that are just as fleshed out and developed as our protagonists. Cardboard cut-out villains just fall flat. I want an antagonist who has motivations, wants, desires, a back story (be it tragic or not so tragic).

Good villains can fall into different categories. There are the evil for the sake of evil villains, who I find very rarely work effectively. A baddie with an evil cackle is just cliché and boring. I like to see complexity in villains. Yes they might well be evil, but why? Is there something in their history that made them that way? Even the pure evil kind of villains can have layers and complexity to them. For evil villains, I want them to genuinely scare me. I want to be scared for my favourite characters. An example that springs to mind is Amarantha from A Court of Thorns and Roses. She’s evil, twisted and sinister and I found Maas’s depiction of her character utterly chilling.

Alternatively, the villain could believe their actions are justified, genuinely believe that what they’re doing is right or for the greater good in some way, but their choices to achieve their goal are morally wrong or result in the deaths of innocents for example. Or the antagonist could be conflicted, fighting between the dark and the light inside them, and maybe they have a redemption arc. Maybe the antagonist isn’t evil at all, they’ve just fallen in with the wrong crowd in an attempt to fit in or have been blackmailed. Can they be redeemed? Or do they succumb to the darkness growing inside them? An interesting angle is having morally grey antagonists (and even grey protagonists too). When the lines between good and evil are more blurred, that can make for a really captivating story.   

I also enjoy books where we have more than one antagonist. There might be a main villain, the evil person who the hero has to defeat at the end of the book/series, and then other antagonists whom the protagonist comes into contact with more frequently and provides a more direct and personal conflict. For an easy example, I’d categorise Voldemort as the main villain in Harry Potter, but Draco is an antagonist who Harry comes into direct conflict with more often as they have an ongoing rivalry.

But how does the story end for the villain? Many books end with the downfall or death of the villain. In order for the heroes to succeed, they have to vanquish the antagonist. However, sometimes an antagonist gets a redemption arc. I do like a good redemption arc but it has to be done well in order to be a satisfying conclusion to that character’s story.

What do you think about villains? Who are your favourite villains from book or screen? Share your thoughts with me in the comments!

8 thoughts on “Let’s Talk Bookish: What Makes A Good Villain

  1. Great discussion!
    We do have some different opinions though, I love villains being evil for the sake of being evil haha! I feel like it often makes the books much darker!

    My post!

  2. I love that you mentioned Draco, because he’s actually my favorite HP character. 💚 I also love it when books have more than one antagonist or a character who represents the actual antagonist until the protagonist can have the “showdown.” I think my favorite kind of villains are the ones revealed late in the story, or were working behind-the-scenes the whole time. An example of this would be President Coin from The Hunger Games.

    I love this discussion so much, and this entire collab was such a treat to read!

    • Yes I thought President Coin was a great antagonist too! That’s one of the things I liked about the Hunger Games, that even the supposed ‘good guys’ aren’t totally ‘good’ even though they are opposing Snow.

  3. I totally agree that evil for the sake of evil rarely works. No one is just born and decided “yes I will just be mean to everyone today”. I think evil works best when the villain is more of a concept or a monster.

    Draco is getting a lot of mentions this week and I’m here for it. I totally agree that stories with multiple villains are fun. I love the minor villains/antagonists especially when they get some redemption. It’s also a lot more interesting to see how the protagonist deals with different sorts of villains.

    • That’s true, villain as a concept or monster is an effective way to do ‘evil’.

      Yes like if there’s more than one villain/antagonist, they can provide different kinds of challenges for the protagonist.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s